Five counties across the United States are rallying behind the Constitution, asserting protection of Second Amendment rights against encroachments from federal and state authorities.
At a Glance
- Indian River County, Florida, joins constitutional sanctuary movement.
- Approximately 70% of U.S. counties adopt Second Amendment sanctuary resolutions.
- Local governments nationwide push back against centralized gun control efforts.
- Lawmaker Ginger Schroeder emphasizes community protection against unconstitutional mandates.
A Trend Towards Constitutional Sanctuaries
In a trend gaining traction, local municipalities are declaring themselves constitutional sanctuaries to shield their Second Amendment rights. Indian River County, Florida, recently joined this movement. The county’s lawmakers have taken a clear stance against any perceived federal or state-level infringements. Sheriff Eric Flowers of Indian River County expressed, “We Stand by the Constitution. We Stand By The Guiding principles of our forefathers.” This movement responds to the rise in centralized gun control measures at state and national levels.
Joining Indian River County are other counties, such as Ottawa County in Michigan and Cattaraugus County in New York. In Cattaraugus County, lawmakers are prepared to “use all legal means at its disposal to oppose unconstitutional efforts” that infringe on the villagers’ rights. Lawmaker Ginger Schroeder highlighted the growing resistance to governmental overreach, stating, “If the state or federal government continue to overstep their bounds and intrude into the lives of our citizens with unconstitutional mandates, our legislature will step up and challenge that.”
Second Amendment Sanctuaries Nationwide
Approximately 70% of U.S. counties have taken up the mantle of Second Amendment sanctuaries. This broad movement sees local authorities enacting measures to protect citizens’ gun rights against federal and state restrictions. The counties span various states including Florida, Michigan, and New York, depicting a widespread grassroots effort. Adding to this coalition, Nevada’s Elko and Lander counties have similarly pledged to stand against governmental restrictions, reinforcing the sanctity of individual rights under the Constitution.
Nevada’s counties have adopted similar resolutions, ensuring that local government structures oppose acts that threaten constitutional promises. This assurance extends to declaring any government overreach as criminal.
Conclusion
This movement marks a significant pushback against perceived federal and state encroachments. By asserting their autonomy, these counties highlight America’s foundational principle of self-governance. While the adoption of constitutional sanctuary status remains relatively limited, the broader Second Amendment sanctuary movement demonstrates a shift towards localized action and constitutional fidelity among citizens and lawmakers.
If this trend continues, more regions may soon follow suit, fostering a deeper commitment to preserve American constitutional liberties.